Skip to main content

Haptotherapy and empathy

03 February 2013 | Opinions 2013 |

Duyndam J.
Keywords| affirmative effect| Empathy| Haptotherapy| IJHH| supportive effect


Abstract

In this article I attempt to approach haptotherapy – and haptonomy in general – from the perspective of empathy. At first sight, here seems to be striking relationships between haptotherapy and empathy. From an empathy perspective, haptotherapy is like empathy-with-the-hands, whereas empathy could be called haptotherapy-with-your-feelers. Both have a supportive, affirmative effect. Both are beneficial but also risky. For both it is important to stay in touch with your own feelings while being in contact with the other person, the client. In haptotherapy practice, the two often go together.

Being myself a non-haptotherapist, I will focus on empathyin in this article. I will present the outline of a theory that gives insight into both the supportive effects of empathy as well as it’s dangerous aspects. I will provide the reader with sufficient points of contact to be able to make the connection to haptotherapy.

References
  1. Ben-Ze”ev, A. (2000), The Subtlety of Emotions. Cambridge Ma: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6548.001.0001
  2. Bohart, A.C. & L.S. Greenberg (Eds.) (1997), Empathy Reconsidered. New Directions in Psychotherapy. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10226-000
  3. Boot, B. (2004), Haptonomie. Een kwestie van gevoel. Amsterdam, Antwerpen: Archipel.
  4. Cupitt, D. (1991), What is a story? London: SCM Press.
  5. Dantzig van, A. (1990), Psychotherapie – een vak apart. Opstellen over mogelijkheden en grenzen van psychotherapie. (Psychotherapy – a Special Profession. Essays on Possibilities and Borders of Psychotherapy). Meppel: Boom.
  6. Duyndam, J. (1997), Denken, passie en compassie (Thinking, Passion, Compassion). Kampen: Kok Agora.
  7. Duyndam, J. (1999), “De plamoen in de hulpverlening. Over de grenzen van emotionele betrokkenheid” (“The Plamoon in Care Practices. On and Across the Borders of Emotional Commitment”). Sociale Interventie (Social Intervention) 8: 2-10.
  8. Duyndam, J. (2002),”Empowerment by Empathy. On Good and Gruesome Empathy”.In: Annemie Halsema and Douwe van Houten (eds.), Empowering Humanity. State of the Art in Humanistics. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom, 2002, pp 139-148.
  9. Duyndam, J. (2010), “Empathy and the Potential Body of Imagination”. In: G. Bottà& M. Härmänmaa (eds.), Language and the Scientific Imagination. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Language Centre
  10. Eisenberg, N. & J. Strayer (Eds.) (1987), Empathy and Its Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Eco, U. (1995), Six Walks in the Fictional Woods. Cambridge Ma.: Harvard University Press.
  12. Gelauff, M. (1995), Op basis van betrokkenheid. Algemeen maatschappelijk werk en ethiek van de zorg. (On a Basis of Commitment. General Welfare and Ethics of Care). Utrecht: SWP.
  13. Hoffman, M.L. (2000), Empathy and Moral Development. Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805851
  14. Husserl, E. (1982), Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenological Philosophy I. The Hague: MartinusNijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7445-6_6
  15. Leclaire, A. (1999), “Inhaken en meehuilen” (“Linking Arms and Crying Along with Others”). In:HP/De Tijd 4 (29/01/99): 34-37.
  16. Levinas, E. (2000), Totality and Infinity. An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by A. de Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
  17. Margulies, A. (1989), The Empathic Imagination. New York: Norton.
  18. Morrison, K.F. (1988), I am You. The Hermeneutics of Empathy in Western Literature, Theology and Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400859436
  19. Newton, A. (1995), Narrative Ethics. Cambridge Ma: Harvard University Press.
  20. Nietzsche, F. (1979), Werke(Works). K. Schlechta (Eds.). Frankfurt/M: Ullstein. In particular: The Antichrist §7, Beyond Good and Evil §222, Thus Spoke Zarathustra II.
  21. Omdahl, B.L. (1995), Cognitive Appraisal, Emotion and Empathy. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  22. Plooij, E. (2005), Haptotherapie. Praktijk en theorie. Amsterdam: Harcourt.
  23. Polkinghorne, D. (1988), Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. New York: SUNY.
  24. Ricoeur, P. (1983), Oneself as Another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  25. Strien van, A.P.M. (1999), Empathie: een kwaliteitsaspect van de psychoanalytische praktijk? (Empathy: A Quality of Psychoanalytic Practice?). Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
  26. Talma, D. (2010), Het lichaam als verhaal. Haptonomie in het dagelijks leven. Amsterdam: Artemis & co.
  27. Tilburg van, W. (2001), “Condities voor empathie” (“Conditions of Empathy”). In: Tijdschrift voor Humanistiek (Journal for Humanistics) 5: 24-32.
  28. Tudor, S. (2001), Compassion and Remorse. Acknowledging the Suffering Other. Leuven: Peeters.

Volume 1

No. 1
2013
  • Publication date:
    February 3, 2013
  • Volume:
  • No.:
    1
  • Page:
    1-6
1
article(s)
How to cite (apa)
Duyndam, J. (2013). Haptotherapy and empathy. In International Journal of Haptonomy and Haptotherapy (Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 1-6). https://doi.org/10.61370/tlas6511
Related Articles