The Use and Evaluation of Haptotherapy by Cancer Patients

Objective

To describe the use and evaluation of haptotherapy in a Dutch psycho-oncological center.

Research questions

(a).How many cancer patients are referred to haptotherapy? (b). Which social and medical background characteristics influence the choice for haptotherapy? (c). How do patients evaluate the haptotherapy they received? and (d). Do patient background characteristics influence the evaluation of the haptotherapy?

Method

An historical cohort study, re-analyzing patient-reported outcomes in the annual evaluation reports between 2007 and 2015 from the psychosocial oncology center, De Vruchtenburg, in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The use of haptotherapy was measured by direct questions to the clients. and checked with the client registration files. Satisfaction was measured on a scale from 0 to 10. Measured background characteristics were gender, age, education level, number of years suffering from cancer, and the medical condition of the patients.

Results

Of the 1202 clients seen during the years 2007 to 2015, 12% was referred to haptotherapy. Satisfaction varies during these years from 7.3 to 8.5 (with a mean of 8.1). Compared to other forms of therapy the haptotherapy satisfaction scores are quite high. Most of the background characteristics do not influence the choice nor the satisfaction of the clients. However, it are primarily clients who are not very ill who use the haptotherapy.

Conclusion

Haptotherapy is used less because of the limited capacity of therapists and the increased likelihood that haptotherapy may not be eligible for healthcare coverage. The generalization is small due to the missing numbers, as well as the fact that the data are only available from one psycho-social cancer institute

1. Berg M., van den, Visser A., P., Schoolmeesters A., Edelman P., Van den Borne B. (2006). Evaluation and effects of haptotherapy for cancer patients treated with chemotherapy at a day clinic. Patient Education and Counseling, 60, 336-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.012
2. Garssen, B., Van der Lee, M., Van der Pol, A., Ranchor, A., Sanderman, R., & Schroevers, M. (2011). Psycho-oncologie helpt: Evaluatie van gespecialiseerde psycho-oncologische zorg in Nederland. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Instellingen voor Psycho-Sociale Oncologie.
3. Haes, J.C.J.M. de, Gualtherie van Weezel, L.M., Sanderman, R., Wiel, H.B.M. van de (2001). Psychological patient care in cancer [Dutch) in: Psychologische patiëntenzorg in de oncologie]. Handboek voor professionals. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
4. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport (2012). Monitor effecten eigen bijdrage GGZ. Retrieved from: https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/blg-186533.pdf on 10-01-2016.
5. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport (2015). Psychosociale zorg bij ingrijpende somatische aandoeningen. Retrieved from http://www.nvpo.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/psychosociale-zorg-bij-somatische-aandoeningen.pdf on 27-12-2015.
6. Schell, N., Visser, A., Staa A. van. (2003). Een bijzondere vorm van zorg: Effecten van gezichtsmassage-ontspanning als complementaire zorg vorm op de kwaliteit van leven van palliatieve kankerpatiënten. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Helen Dowling Instituut.
7. Spijker, A. van ‘t, Trijsburg, R.W. & Duivenvoorden, H.J. (1997). Psychosocial sequalae of cancer diagnosis: a meta analytical review of 58 studies after 1980. Psychosomatic Medicine, 59, 208-293. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199705000-00011
8. Sprangers, M.A.G., Smets, E.M.A. & Stiegels, H. (2001). Gevolgen van de ziekte. In: Haes, J.C.J.M. de, Gualtherie
9. van Weezel, L.M., Sanderman, R., Wiel, H.B.M. van de (2001). Psychologische patiëntenzorg in de oncologie. Handboek voor professionals. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
10. SPPS (2018), IMP-SAS, UK, Londen.
11. Vennix A., Visser A., Van der Doef M. (2016). Effects of changes in health insurance and legislation on the inflow of clients and the treatment evaluation for clients receiving psycho-oncological care at de Vruchtenburg, Pro-health.org, Rotterdam;
12. Institute of Health Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, De Vruchtenburg, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
13. Visser, A., Remie, M. & Garssen, B. (2000). Psychosociale begeleiding bij kanker en aids. Rotterdam: Uitgeverij Marita Meeuwes.
14. Visser A., Schoolmeesters, A., Van den Berg M., Schell N., De Gelder,R., Van den Borne, B. (2011). Methodological reflections on body-mind intervention studies with cancer patients. Patient Education and Counseling 82, 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.003
15. Visser, A., Wildenbeest, M. (2012). Psycho-sociale begeleiding door de Vruchtenburg 2004 – 2010. Pallium, nr.1, 8-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12479-012-0006-3
16. Visser A., Vennix A., Van der Doef M. (2018). Impact of changes in national health care legislation and financial cuts by health insurance companies on use and evaluation of psycho-oncological care. Journal of Cancer Science & Therapy, 10, 392-398. https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5956.1000573
17. Vruchtenburg (2011). Missie en visie De Vruchtenburg. Retrieved from http://www.devruchtenburg.nl/visie-en missie on 27-12 – 2015.
18. Vruchtenburg (2012). Psychologische zorg bij de Vruchtenburg. Retrieved from http://www.devruchtenburg.nl/begeleiding-bij-de-vruchtenburg on 27-12-2015.
19. Vruchtenburg (2013). Voor verwijzers naar De vruchtenburg. Retrieved from http://www.devruchtenburg.nl/voor zorgverleners/ on 27-12-2015.
20. Yang S.C., Visser, A. & Ter Doest, I. (2010). Mindfulness-stress reduction training for oncology patients: changes in mindfulness and well-being. Rotterdam, the Netherlands, De Vruchtenburg.